13 October 1866 Gloucester
Journal FATAL COLLIERY ACCIDENT The adjourned inquiry into
the death of John Hooper, a pit sinker, who was killed on 30 September.
Edward Henderson deposed: I am a
master sinker, and have had a contract from June last sinking the Flour
Mill Colliery with drifts. The deceased had worked at the
colliery
since July last. On Saturday week about 5 o’clock I saw the
deceased
in a pit, about 10 feet from the bottom. The pit was being sunk
and
walled, and on the scaffold the deceased was at work. He was the
master of the men when I was not present and had full charge of the
work
and machinery. On the Sunday morning at about 1 o’clock I was
called
up by a person who stated that the man was in the pit, and was either
drowned
or killed. I, in company with William James, went down the pit to
the sump, below the place where the deceased was at work. In my
opinion
deceased had fallen from his stage to the sump and was drowned.
There were no signals in the pit,
there was no banksman, the man was his own master.
Lionel Brough, Government Inspector
of Mines: There was a good steam engine on the work, well
adapted
for sinking, and in my opinion, together with the tackle, remarkably
good.
The pit appeared well walled as far as I went down, which was as far as
I could go for water. There are pumps in the pit in connection
with
the engine, for raising the water or any other matter. There was
only one steam engine in the place, and that, as far as I could see was
applied to both pumping and winding.
Act not complied with, no
indicator to show the load in the pit; absence of proper communication
between men in the pit and those above; no banksman to communicate
between
those in the pit and those engaged above; no guides in the pit although
in sinking pits guides might be dispensed with; there was sufficient
break
power; no special rules, some should be submitted at once.
William Trafford, mining engineer,
Blakeney: There is a steam engine, ‘two fourteens’ nominal power,
together about 40 horse. I went down the shaft with Mr. Henderson
and found the ‘half moon’, a temporary stage, at about 22 or 23 feet
from
the bottom of the pit. There were from 6 to 8 feet of water in
the
pit. The half moon was not made as secure as I would have had it
done. The deceased would be the person to see to this.
There
was a boarded stage under the half moon at about 12 feet depth and on
one
side of this was an opening where the deceased must have fallen
through.
The area of this aperture would be from 4 to 5 feet. One engine
to
pump and wind I think dangerous.
The Jury found that John Hooper
died through his own want of caution and consider that he ought to have
appointed someone to have officially watched the top of the pit they
srongly
recommend more caution for the future on the part of the proprietors
and
managers.
FLOUR MILL COLLIERY
Flour Mill was first galed on 4th
August 1843 to William Jones, who applied to the Crown for a lease of
one
and a half acres adjoining a site for a colliery for the purpose of
erecting
buildings and apparatus. By 23rd August, however, it would appear
that he had disposed of his interest to George Skipp. This
worried
the Crown’s deputy surveyor who believed that Skipp intended building a
chemical works on the site and feared the possible pollution of the
stream.
The main reason for his concern was probably that the stream ran past
his
house in Parkend! The chemical works was built by 1844, but the
pollution
is not recorded.
It would appear that the dead rent
on the Flour Mill gale was not paid for some time, possibly because
Skipp
was not interested in the minerals. Certainly he was two and a
half
years in arrears at Xmas 1845. In April 1859 the gale was put up
for auction at the Feathers Hotel in Lydney but the bidding did not
reach
the reserve price and the sale did not go through. By Midsummer
1861
the arrears of rent stood against Messrs. Bailey, Greatrex & Co.,
bankers
of Monmouth. They had probably acquired the gale in lieu of
payment
on a mortgage.
New owners had been found by May
1864, these being Messrs. Ralph and Arthur James Price of London, who
applied
for a license of two acres of land. The Crown surveyor thought
this
to be a large area of land for a colliery, but was informed by the
Prices
that this was the smallest area on which they were advised they could
erect
engine houses for the pumping machines and winding engines, forges,
stables,
carpenters’ shops, tip ground and other accommodation needed to work
the
colliery on ‘the very large scale’ they intended. The lease was
granted
from 24th June 1864 for a term of 31 years at a rent of £5 per
annum.
Work on opening up the gale
commenced
with shaft sinking being in progress during 1866. In October,
following
a fatality to a man engaged on the sinking operation, it was reported
that
there was one steam engine on the work used for both pumping and
winding
whilst the shaft appeared to be progressing well.
Work on the shafts may have been
completed sufficiently to allow some coal to be won as in 1870 the
owners
applied to lay a tramroad connection to the Oakwood tramway, presumably
to allow output to be carried away.
In December 1873 a new company was
formed, The Flour Mill Colliery Co. Ltd., with the intention of
acquiring
the Flour Mill and Ellwood Collieries. The capital was
£12,000
in 240 £50 shares. The main promotors behind the company
appear
to have been Capt. Francis Pavy and Thomas Head and they entered into
an
agreement with Arthur Price. They were at liberty to use the
pumping
engine to dewater the pits and to complete the sinking of the land pit
and if by the 1st August 1874 they had unwatered the pits and completed
the sinking then they could either complete the purchase or
withdraw.
The latter seems to have been the course of action taken as the company
was in liquidation in January 1875. George Skipp was said at this
time to be the agent of Price while an indication of some of the plant
at the colliery was given. There was a 15" pumping lift complete
weighing 28 tons, a 12" lift weighing 36 tons, five iron pit tubs and
120
yards of pit rods. From the terms of the agreement it would
appear
that no work was being done at the colliery as it would seem that the
shafts
were flooded and that sinking was not complete. Some coal
however,
was won around this time as an advertisement in September 1874 stated
that
prime Coleford High Delf coal could be had at the colliery daily from 7
am to 3 pm at a price of 17s. per ton.
In February 1876 the owners of the
colliery became involved in legal proceedings brought by the owners of
the adjoining Princess Royal gale. This was because the owners of
Flour Mill had stopped pumping in December 1874, probably due to the
failure
of the company as mentioned above. This cessation of pumping
brought
about the flooding of Princess Royal and the court found in favour of
the
plaintiffs. In March the Crown’s attention was drawn to an
accumulation
of water in two of the pits, known as Park Gutter, in the deep gale of
the Princess Royal Colliery. This had been allowed to rise above
the level of the workings to the injury of Flour Mill Colliery, on the
land side of the Princess Royal gale, and the Crown was requested to
‘cause
such water to be removed by the galee of the Princess Royal Colliery’!
In November 1877 the Flour Mill
gale was being assigned to Mr. W. Fowler, but it would appear that he
did
not carry out any further development, as in early 1882 an inquiry was
made to the Gaveller as to whether any work was being carried out
following
the terms of the gale grant. In May ownership passed to Mr.
Chapman,
executor of Fowler’s will, and as work had not restarted by September,
the gale was forfeited to the Crown.
By November 1886 Flour Mill had
passed to William Camm and Richard Watkins, owners of Princess Royal,
who
were anxious to open the colliery but not prepared to install expensive
pumping equipment immediately. Instead Watkins proposed to drain
the collieries by continuing to drive the old Dyke’s (Whitecroft) Level
to the Whittington seam.
The Flour Mill Colliery was working
the coal from the bottom of the shaft, which was 190 yards deep,
upwards
towards the western boundary of the gale, almost to the outcrop of the
seam. In 1904 it therefore became necessary to sink a new shaft,
140 yards deep and fourteen feet in diameter, which enabled the company
to develop the dip of the seam. The area they were working in,
however,
proved to be very heavily watered and required the pumping of up to
3,000
gallons per minute. Later considerable geological difficulties
were
met and it became necessary for yet another shaft to be sunk. As
will be seen later this was overcome by deepening the shaft at Park
Gutter.
In March 1908 it was reported that
an underground engine house was being built for a haulage engine which
had been delivered. On the surface two new boilers with steam
range
and an economiser had been erected and a third boiler was expected
daily.
The electrical generator house was being roofed and was thus nearing
completion.
Flour Mill Colliery suffered from
a strike in October 1909 when six buttymen came out in dispute over the
cuuting of a pillar of coal. The rest of the 700 men also came
out
and the pit ponies were put up for sale. The buttymen took the matter
to
Court but lost and the srike was over within the month. A more
serious
strike was the national one of 1912 and it was after this shutdown that
the decision was made to start work on the deepening of the Park Gutter
shaft to assist the winning of coal from Flour Mill and to open up new
areas of the Coleford High Delf as laid out in the 1904 arrangements.
Flour Mill and Park Gutter were
connected underground in early 1916 to provide efficient ventilation
and
to enable the start of coal production on a larger scale. Some
coal
was still being brought up the middle shaft at Flour Mill until 1928, a
peculiarity here being that the cages in the shaft were small and pit
ponies
had to sit on their haunches when entering them to be let down the
shaft.
For the rest of the history of Flour Mill see Princess Royal below.